Tej Ram And Sons (Huf) v. Vijay Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 16962-CII-2019 in/and CR No. 4856-2019 Date of decision:-22.08.2019 TEJ RAM AND ORS.
.....Petitioners vs.
VIJAY KUMAR ....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Anubhav Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.
RITU BAHRI, J.(Oral) C.M. No. 16962-CII-2019 Application is allowed as prayed for.
Accordingly, Annexure P-6 to P-8 are taken on record. CR No. 4856-2019 Petitioners are seeking setting aside of impugned order dated 11.07.2019 (P-5).
The grievance of the petitioners before this Court is that while dismissing their application for appointment of Local Commissioner, the trial Court has observed that the spot inspection report is not in favour of the plaintiffs/petitioners.
Heard.
Since the evidence of the plaintiffs has not been concluded, the present petition stands disposed of keeping in view judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in a case of Haryana Waqf Board vs. Shanti Sarup and others, 2008 (8) SCC 671 and the plaintiffs can reserve their right to lead evidence in rebuttal if need be.
22.08.2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
No Gaurav Arora 2019.08.28 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh