Thakur Lal Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2023:PHHC:092879

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22459-2018 DECIDED ON: 20.07.2023 THAKUR LAL SHARMA .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Ms. Bhagyashri, Advocate for Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate and Ms. Gitanjali Chhabra, Advocate for respondent No.4.

***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner do not want to press the instant petition as he has retired on 30.09.2022, whereas respondent No.4 against whom the relief was sought, was also superannuated from the service on 30.06.2019.

In the light of the same, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he did not want to pursue the same.

Petition stands disposed of as having not been pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 20.07.2023 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2023.07.24 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD