← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32474/2026disposed of

Gopika v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-06-02Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

CRM-M No.32474 of 2026 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.32474 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:02.06.2026 Gopika ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH

Present:

Mr. Angel Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

1.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to fair, impartial and expeditious disposal of representations (Annexure P-1) & (Annexure P-3 to Annexure P-6) to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members, and that to take action in accordance with law against the respondent No.4 and other private respondents.

2.

The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation dated 30.01.2026 (Annexure P-5) before the respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar. The learned counsel prays for disposing of the present petition by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. MANOJ KUMAR 2026.06.02 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.32474 of 2026 (O&M) I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. has appeared on behalf of respondent-State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-5), by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is, however, clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 02.06.2026 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.06.02 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document