Naresh Pal Dahiya v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2211-2022 Date of Decision: 14.02.2023 Naresh Pal Dahiya .... Petitioner
Versus
Sate of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present: - Mr. Ivneet Singh Pabla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 is taken on record.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such, because in terms of order dated 22.11.2022, passed by this Court, the petitioner had surrendered before the Appellate Court, Kurukshetra and was released on bail.
In view of the above, the instant revision petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 14.02.2023 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2023.02.15 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment