Jagmohan Singh Bhatti v. Union Of India & ORS

CWP-2256-2018 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2256-2018 Date of Decision: February 02, 2018 Jagmohan Singh Bhatti .....Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.J.S.Bhatti, Petitioner in person.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The instant writ petition has been purportedly filed in public interest seeking quashing of appointment of respondent Nos.6 to 9 as Chief Parliamentary Secretaries in State of Haryana. It is claimed that the issue raised herein stands settled by a Division Bench of this Court in an earlier PIL filed by the petitioner reported as (Jagmohan Singh Bhatti vs Union of India and others) (2018-1) 189 PLR 29 (Annexure P-1). Relying upon the said decision, the petitioner has already approached the State Government about ten days back on 20.01.2018 by way of a representation (Annexure P2). [2] In this view of the matter and without expressing any views on merits, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Chief Secretary, Haryana, to put up petitioner's representation before the Meenu 2018.02.14 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-2256-2018 -2Competent Authority for its consideration and appropriate decision be taken in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE February 02, 2018 ( SHEKHER DHAWAN ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.02.14 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh