Sushil Kumar Alias Sheelu v. State Of Haryana

 &' 121


 
         
   

 &' 12 
  * 1-2-12 21 21 

 !" #  $$  -----



 3  %!%$ &'

!"(!)!

----- 
*
    

 +, - 

 

  , % &'%&('

$

 "     ,.  /,0

 ) &!$ 

 * !

 '

+!$  

     



$"  ,

 " /01

      
,$ -!

!,,
"!$ 

  



 

 

   

    . $ !,

   "   $      & &!  !   " '"  $ /013",  !#  $ "  " 

2

" $ $      $! 

$  !

  "#"

,, /01

 3.

After having referred to the M Medico Legal Report, State could not controvert the aforesaid assertion, though th he report to the effect that there is s an abrasion o n the left hand, as per the case o of the complainant, has been cau used with knife.

. However, be that as it may, in th he light of fact that the State is no ot in SUDHIR KUMAR 2024.07.23 20:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 &' 121 dispute with the fact that the injury has been declared simple in nature, which is in the form of abrasion, even if the prosecution case is taken as gospel truth, on that account, neither any recovery of weapon is to be effected nor custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to get any detail with regard to the involvement of the present petitioner in the present case, who otherwise can be interrogated.

4.

Notice of motion 5.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S.Virk, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the Staterespondent 6.

0   , 

    '   " "   ,, # #   $   "  &  ' #  #+! &$ 



!  " ,4!

      $ 

 (40' 2

$  )  "   ,,      3  $  '!$ 

    5 #'3 $, $ "   $ 3",#  

$ 

 &  ' #  #+  "  * ! ,, ! 3$,,$$,,    ) "  

3,, #   /   ,0 1-2-121 
 



 
   
 SUDHIR KUMAR 2024.07.23 20:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document