← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/20018/2020disposed of

Kashmir Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2020-11-25Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.20018 of 2020 Date of Decision: 25.11.2020 Kashmir Singh

...Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Daldeep Singh Shukarchakia, DAG, Punjab.

(Presence marked through video conference).

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner inter alia seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 2 to 5 to decide their pending representations contained at Annexures P-2 to P-5. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.7 trespassed into the petitioner's land and has forcibly taken possession of the same. He submits that the petitioner filed a detailed complaint to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar, but to no avail. Thereafter, petitioner filed civil suit, in which status quo was granted. He further submits that respondent No.7 is guilty of having committed offences under Section 447, 448 etc. IPC, but yet no FIR has not been registered by the local police due to the influence exercised by him. Various representations to respondents No. 2 to 6 have not been adverted till date. Hence, this petition. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. D.S.Shukarchakia, DAG, Punjab, who has joined proceedings on service of advance copy of the petition appears and accepts notice on behalf of the State of Punjab.

SONU 2020.11.26 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

5.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

6.

Without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with an expectation that competent authority of respondents would look into the representations of the petitioner and if warranted, proceed in accordance with law.

7.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

NOVEMBER 25, 2020 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONU 2020.11.26 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document