Namita And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRWP-6334-2026 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6334-2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 NAMITA AND ANR.

....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Amit Khari, Advocate for the petitioners. .....

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the private respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) to the Superintendent of Police, District Yamuna Nagar and they shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-4).

2.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. 3.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

PUNEET SHARMA 2026.05.27 19.08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRWP-6334-2026 -24.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2Superintendent of Police, District Yamuna Nagar is directed to look into the representation dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) qua threat perception only and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. 5.

With these observations, this petition is disposed of. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 26.05.2026 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No PUNEET SHARMA 2026.05.27 19.08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment