Brij Pal And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.19 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24571-2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24571-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.10.2019 Brij Pal and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) This Court, vide order dated 18.07.2019, had already dismissed the writ petition qua petitioner No.1.

Learned counsel for the State has produced detailed Marks obtained by petitioner No.2-Rakesh Kumar, in a sealed cover. The same has been opened, perused and on comparison with cut off 89, petitioner No.2, has obtained 76 marks, therefore, has not been able to come within the zone of consideration.

In such circumstances, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 17.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No