Vikas Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Other

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24581-2017 Date of Decision: October 31, 2017 Vikas .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Virender Mandhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner alleges that Gram Panchayat land comprising in Khasra No.44/6 and 45/8, which is reserved for common purpose (toilets), has been encroached upon by the private respondents. He seeks a direction to the authorities for their eviction.

[2] Since the petitioner has got an alternative remedy to file an eviction petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, as applicable to State of Haryana, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to ascertain the allegations made by the petitioner and take necessary remedial action in accordance with law. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE October 31, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.11.01 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh