Kiran Bansal v. State Of Punjab And ANR
! "!#$%$&'((
')*+++
! "
#
+,-. /0 $
%
& '
& ()* +
,+ ,- -,-.
&
.-,) /
$0 %
1 & 2
-,$. / ' &
" *&
' ' &/ * $.3.0-,-.
4 -5 ,+ -,-.
-
%
()! &
!
4 ' 4 6
&&
!&78)97%/ & )
! && &
4 !! &!
)97%/
! '
4 !
/
!
&4 / !
& 4
&!
&
4&
! 4 /! 4
4 0 4 4 $3 !
4 & 4 4
4/ ! &
4 4 '
4 4'! ! '&&
4 0 4 4 !
& :4
; < /&
= = '
&> 4 & 4 4 +,,,,?'!& 4 !
/ 4
!
& 4 44
' / %
4 &
4
&
4
&& / 4
!
& 4 = 4 '
9
& 4 69 6 4
4 !
'
4
4
!
% 4
4
&
!
4 ! &
4 4 '
%
4 &
!
4 @4 &='
4 !
4!
!
' & & 4 :
4 -.
5+ ,,,?4 4! =
4 & : @
4
&
! = 4 $ +, ,,,? +, ,,,?
'
= ! >
4 4 4 4 '
:
& & 4 @ 4
()
! &
)
&
&
&
4
& ! !4 ' / 6&
*&
$0 ,0 -,-.
.
&/ * $.3.0-,-.
& / !
&
& 4 - A, ,,,? %&
&
4
!
4
-5 ,+ -,-.
+
%
'
&
& '
&&
& 4 4 4
!
4 '
!!! &44& 4
' 4! !&
4 - A, ,,,? '
4
=
4 ., ,,,? !
4
' =
& '4 & 4
) & !
:
& '4&
' = ( '
' 4 * =
! & '
! 4 ' & ' 4 &
'
& <
& = "
4 4 44
!
&
4
& 4 4
4 & ' / * $.3.0-,-.
>
& 4
'4 4
& 4
!
% '&4
. 1$.2 &"
!34. 3 5 2 1$. 2 &" !34. 3 6 + ! 2 .12 &"
2.7829$8$/ &#!
-,,A1-A2 / 1/4 2.-+B+.$+7"$:+!&6 2!+ ! ;!% !&8 / -,$-152 / 1/4 2$-2$%2 3 +$&826+ ! .< & -,-.*/ <</.A$,+
%
4
&
& &
4' $$()4
& & &
4
&()* 0A
,+ ,+ -,$A &
.-, !
$-,) / & <
=
& = & &
& 4
'
) & &
& ' 4 4 &
&
!
)
!
&
& &
% & &
4
4
= ! & 4 4 '
:
& 4 ! 4 &
4
' & 4 4 &> &
! 4 -.
5+ ,,,?!
) 4
& '
&/* $.3.0-,-.
4
& !
4 & 4 4 ' '
&
& ! = ! :
4
> $,
%
!4 4
& '
= 4 '
& ! &
'
! 4 & ?
' 4
'
&4 '
4 !4 & 4 ? ! !4
&
4 4 & ! =& !
! / & !
!! & 4 '
& ' '&!
'
4 4 & ! ' '4 $ ., ,,,?
4 4 $ 4 4 44 !
% 4 / 4 & 4 &
( $$
%
! & !
& =
4
&
&
&4 ' 4 4 4
&& &
&
&
=
4 4 4
' & 4 & 4 4 '
( &
&
& 4
'
4 !
&!
'
4 4 ' :
' 4 4
& 4
$-
)t is well settled proposition of law that arrest is a part of procedure of the investigation to secure not only the presence of the accused but several other purposes. The powers of anticipatory bail are extra ordinary and the same are to be exercised sparingly in exceptional circumstances. The judicial discretion conferred upon the Court has to be properly exercised after application of mind as to the nature and gravity of the accusation, possibility of applicant fleeing from justice and other factors to decide whether it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail as such grant to some extent interferes in the sphere of investigation of an
? offence. % /
'
4 & 4 ' /
&
=
'4
= &
! !
!
.0A/
/
The Court must be circumspect while exercising such power for grant of anticipatory bail and it should not be granted as a matter of rule and has to be granted only when the Court is convinced that exceptional circumstances exist to resort to that extra ordinary remedy. In the present case, no such exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing. As such, I am of the considered opinion that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
-+0 ((
4 >
&? ?* >
?*