High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/3558/2016dismissed

Sub Divisional Officer & ORS v. Permanent Lok Adalat Public Utility Services Panipat Th Its Chairman Panipat & ANR

2016-02-23Mr. Justice R.P. Nagrath2 pages

KUMAR MANOJ 2016.02.29 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3558 of 2016 Date of Order: 23.02.2016 Sub Divisional Officer and Ors.

....Petitioners

Versus

Permanent Lok Adalat, PUS, Panipat and Anr.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN

Present:

Ms. Geeta Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J The petitioners have challenged the order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PUS), Panipat vide which the application filed under Section 22-C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for short "the Act") by respondent No.2, has been allowed. The case set up by the petitioners is that the cheque deposited by respondent No.2 was not encashed, therefore loss of `13,670/- had occurred to the petitioners. However, the finding recorded by the Permanent Lok Adalat in para Nos.6,7 & 8 of the impugned order is perfectly justified and does not call for interference. Hence, the present petition is dismissed.

February 23, 2016 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) manoj JUDGE