Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana
145+208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-49853-2024 in/and CRM-M-36199-2024 Date of Decision: December 16, 2024 Sunil Kumar ...Pe44oner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Rakshak Gupta, Advocate for the pe
oner.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) A er arguing for some me, statement is made by learned counsel for the pe
oner, so as to withdraw this pe
on.
In view of the aforesaid statement, present pe
on is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending applica on(s), if any stand(s) disposed of.
December 16, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Sarita Rani 2024.12.16 05:55 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order