Raj Kumar Narwal v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17471-2024 Date of decision: 08.08.2024 Raj Kumar Narwal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed for directing the respondents to count service of the petitioner rendered by him. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner faced with the fact that a demand ought to have been raised as a pre-requisite to seeking a writ of mandamus, wishes to withdraw the instant petition to enable him to file a representation, which he prays may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. In case petitioner submits a representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.08.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No HAMANT 2024.08.08 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment