High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/19607/2020disposed of

M/S Jitender Kumar And Co. v. State Of Haryana And Others

2020-11-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan,Mr. Justice Vivek Puri2 pages

CWP-19607-2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19607-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.11.2020 M/S JITENDER KUMAR & CO.

...PETITIONER

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI

Present:

Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Bahri, Addl.A.G., Haryana for respondent No. 1.

Ms. Shubhra Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

***** JITENDRA CHAUHAN J. (ORAL) The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and as per instructions. This Civil writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ of in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter of intent dated 03.06.2016 (Annexure P-5) issued by the Secretary-cum-Executive Officer, Market Committee, Ambala Cantt., Ambala.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No. 2 to consider JYOTI 2020.11.25 23:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-19607-2020 -2and decide the legal notice dated 18.03.2020 (Annexure P-7) expeditiously. Heard.

A complete set of paper book has already been handed over to learned counsel for the respondents.

In view of the above, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Sector -6, Panchkula to consider and decide the legal notice dated 18.03.2020 (Annexure P-7) within two weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioner is admissible to it, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed, within a period of two weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. However, in case the competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioner is not admissible or made out, in that case, a speaking order be passed in the matter.

(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) (VIVEK PURI) JUDGE JUDGE 18.11.2020 jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No JYOTI 2020.11.25 23:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document