Pawan Kumar v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd & ANR..

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.17 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24956-2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24956-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.10.2019 Pawan Kumar ... Petitioner

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.3.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Mr. R.S. Longia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that grievance of petitioner for nonissuance of appointment letter for the post of Assistant Lineman under Scheduled Category, no longer subsists as same has been issued. However, Ms. Alka Chatrath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that claim with regard to seniority and pay fixation, would be point of determination.

Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, no cause of action survives in present writ petition and same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.17 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24956-2017 (O&M) However, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a representation with regard to claim qua seniority and pay fixation and in case, such representation is made within a period of three weeks, the same shall be decided keeping in view the judgments (Annexures P-8, P-12 and P-14).

( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 14.10.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No