Jai Mohan v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.16 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25034-2017 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25034-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.09.2019 Jai Mohan ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.3-Chief/Engineer/Commercial, UHBVN, Panchkula, to consider the representation dated 29.06.2017 (Annexure P-5), within a stipulated period.

Without going into the merits and demerits of the claim of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.3, to consider the representation dated 29.06.2017 (Annexure P-5), within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall pass a speaking order thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner and taking into consideration judicial precedents as well, failing which, respondent No.3. shall be liable to pay costs of `25,000/- to petitioner. This condition of imposing costs is only to prevent petitioner to

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.09.16 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25034-2017 (O&M) run from pillar to post and avail remedy of contempt in case of noncompliance of directions issued by this Court. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 12.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No