Balwan v. State Of Haryana
!
"#$%$ & '
() ()
& )))) $ $ &, -,%.% /
!
,0 &
))))) %1 &"&
'
23 ) // 4
/ 4
)
6, *7 !
" # " $$ $ "
# %& ' () *!
,*,!
-*)&./-*,0!,* 1&. # $$ 2$ # !-3!)4
,
# 5 $
# .
$ &5 ##$ # 5 # !-3!)$ 1 #5 /234
$ #/ 23
5#6 # !*)3!7!. .
" 8-*
$1 #5 9 $#
##
.#
51 #5 5 $ "#5
# : # # # & ##$ 1 #5 ## $ # 9 5
#$ # #
"
;$ %& $
" 5
*!
,*,!
55 # # 5 < #6 $ $ $ "
# 5 $
5 # $"" < # $ *7 *7 ,*,7 = #
. " 5 #$.
!+(,* ,*,- .
!-)8! ,*,+ .
+)+>- ,*,+55 5 5 ,( *- ,*,-,!
*- ,*,+ ,) *( ,*,+ # $$"
". $$ "
#" 5 #$
-
< # " ## #
5 5" # " # # ## ""
*!
,*,! # *+ ##$
$
#$ #5 " "#
## $5 "$ "
#
+
# #
" #
5#5
# -) 5,!5 "?
##
$ # $ 5 *!
,*,! ##$
#5#5
5 #5 *+ *- *7 *7 *) ,*,7 # ?
# ,! 5 -) 5 ## .
# # 5##"
"
#
$ $
#$ 5 # #5 *+ ## ?
# !7 5
##$ 5 #" # # # "#"
" " #.
7.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC 695 has held as under:
"Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice."
>
# 5## # #$ $5 ##
. # #
$ $ $ "
# $# ##5 "# # $"
#3 " #. 34
$ '$ ##" ?
() ()
/ 4
: $3 @3' : "# @3'