Rampal Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others
!
"
!
#$%& ' !
(#$%&
)*!
+ &+
, %&#
- !
.
/ 0 !
3 !
"
#+%#+#$%& %4+%#+#$%!
!
!
!
%45 ' (%45
*!
" !
!
/
+
- -2 6
%&+$%+#$%7!
+%!5$!$$!$$$8- + +
!
-
' * #$%&
!
+ 9 " !
%%+$+#$#:!
+#!$!$#!4#8- "
" + :+
+ !
;<<2 !
" = + +
< !
- "
- -2 6 !
3
> # #$%&
%&+$%+#$%7
!
%'"* # # !
" "
"
- "
+ +%
" +
$:
.
/ 0
8 !
!
$?
"
+ @
++ # #$%&
;A"
>
!" #$% "
!
" + ; !
"
" >
"
> "
B+ 7
!
" + B " + 7+ 6 !
" B+& "
;A"
> !
+
=
!
"
B+ 7
+ < !
;A"
> C- '
& ' " ()
*+!"* ,+ % %7 C- "#!
On facts and in the light of the legal position emerging from the various decisions referred to above, it is not possible for us to say that cut of 20% adopted by the learned Single Judge as affirmed by the Division Bench in the impugned judgment is wrong or unsustainable. It appears to us having regard to facts and circumstances of the case that the High Court has applied cut of 20% as against the normal 1/3 deduction. We find that the High Court was right and justified in doing so.
15.
The decision of Bhagwathula Samanna (supra) does not help the appellants as the said decision was rendered on the facts of that case. As already noticed above, the said decision was referred to in earlier decisions of this Court and distinguished. That was a case of a fully developed land having all amenities and situated in an advantageous position. In the context of the facts of that case, in para 11, it is stated thus:- "The principle of deduction in the land value covered by the comparable sale is thus adopted in order to arrive at the market value of the acquired land. In applying the principle it is necessary to consider all relevant facts. It is not the extent of the area covered under the acquisition which is the only relevant factor.
Even in the vast area there may be land which is fully developed having all amenities and situated in an advantageous position. If smaller area within the large tract is already developed and suitable for building purposes and have in its vicinity roads, drainage, electricity, communications etc. then the principle of deduction simply for the reason that it is part of the large tract acquired, may not be justified."(emphasis supplied) 16.
In that case deduction was not given on the ground that even in the vast area there may be land, which is fully developed having all amenities and situated in an advantageous position; if smaller area
within the large tract is already developed and suitable for building purposes and have in its vicinity roads, drainage, electricity, communication, etc., then the principle of deduction simply for the reason that it is part of the large tract acquired, may not be justified. 17.
In the present case the situation is entirely different. The area acquired is not a small area; it was not developed; may be it had some advantages; a small portion of the large tract was abutting the main road; it was also not the case that any smaller area within the large tract of land acquired was fully developed having all facilities as in the case of Bhagwathula Samanna (supra). The appellants herein did not establish that the entire area of 84 acres of land acquired was fully developed having all the facilities such as roads, drains, sewers, water, electricity lines and civic amenities.
In order to convert the land into plots for the purpose of construction of residential and commercial buildings certain area was to be earmarked for the abovementioned purposes in accordance with the law governing in the matter of creating layouts in addition to incurring of expenditure for the development area. Hence the claim of the appellants that there should have been no deduction out of the compensation amount determined for the entire area acquired is unsustainable. May be the acquired land with potentiality for construction of residential and commercial buildings had some advantages, which aspect is taken note of by the High Court in giving cut of only 20% as against 1/3 normal deduction."
'
&
" ()
$ -.
"!*+ + &$
C- " $ The learned Single Judge of the High Court has taken into consideration the nature of the land sought to be acquired in relying on Ex.P.6 in assessing the market value thereof and has applied a deduction of 70% in arriving at the compensation to be awarded to the claimants in respect of the said lands. The various other documents which were produced on behalf of the claimants were in respect of the lands which were similar to the lands forming the subject matter of Ex.P.6. The learned Single Judge has given reasons for not relying on
all the other exemplars in choosing to rely on Ex.P.6 alone. But the rate of deduction applied appears to be on the high side in relation to the developmental work involved in making the acquired land suitable for the purposes for which they were so acquired. The acquired lands are adjacent to the village abadi which is already developed. Having regard to the consistent view that a deduction of 1/3rd of the market value is normal, though a higher deduction is permissible, we are of the view that deduction of 60% would meet the expenditure towards developmental charges considering the proximity of the acquired lands to the areas already developed.
'
& / ) '
0 1 2 -3' (( 40
++ !" ,5+
%$
C- "# $
%&
'(
(
)( ) ( ( +
- .
+) ,) - / 0
1(
&
(( $ 3, (
((* /
(
1
,
& (1
& ) $ 4&
, ( ( , &
( ! 5
& ) (
)
6( $
,
()
(
5
, 7(
( 5
4 7(
$
/
( ! 5* , '(
$$# (
1 $ * *!89
(
,, $ * $:
'
64 &
7 (.
+
!" &# %C- "$ ; )+
(
& )
*
<(
+ &
)
( ,
& )$ = ( ,
8
& )
) > , /*
( 1 )
'(
1 (?
,
)) ,
+ +
$2
/* ,(
( 1 )
& )*
&
/
$
(
& )
& )
(
& )*
(
'(
1
( .( (
,
* /* +
( / $
&
()
&&
'(
1
$
$
@ 4/ 0 (( + .
$ & $ A A()
$*
## #
8*
( > "# $ @
, &(
)
&
(
1 1
(
& 1 ) ,)
1 (
,
)) ,
+ +*
* $ 3,* ,(
( & 1 )
& )*
&
/
*
$:
!$
7 & +
7(
(
)
1 (
,
,
(16
&
(
(* *
& ) (
$ (*
(
1 ) ,
& )
* /
/
( # '(
& )
+ (
$ $
(
(
& )* 01 ))
B( (, 1 ( 4)
(
= C $
$ & $ 0 C
'(
,,
$*
#
7( #
( > "#$ @ , )+ &( '(
( &
( &
(
& / &
( #9
)+ &(
& )
& )
'(
1 ) , ) ) (1
( ,
'( $ @ A ( & $ 0 4/
D
# ! 7( >
$ * 8 "8E @
((
( &
&( , (
)) ( )/ #9
)(
)
1
(
( )(
) /1 '(
(16
&
(* * ( &&
,
& )
'(
,
&
)
&
)+
,
)) ( $
)/ 1 (&*
)/ 1
,
1 ,( , ( )+
( 2 )/ 1
(
)
&
(
1(
)/ & + )/ 1 / )/ 1 &
$ 0 )(
)/ 1 (
& & $
)
)
,(/
&
)
'(
1
,
& ) ( )(
1
&
(
$ @ 1
( & * )/
/ 6
&
*
(* (/ '(
& ,
)
1( )
&
*
&
&
$ @ D!
'(
& ,
1(
) )
& )
'(
/
*
* * / &
&
) $ 4&*
)
&
&(
&
( )/ (
( 1
& )
'(
)/ 1
($ 3 )/ 1 &(
, ( ,
)/ & 1 +
/
( /)
)
& )
)/ 1
)
) #9
)
#9 $ @ )( 1 ))1
,, 1
&
& &(*
/ 1
& $ 3 ,
&
6
&
, )+ &/
(
&
1
&(
1(
* (/ &
'(
* ,
& ) ( $:
)
( 3 ( #9
(
36() .6 &$ 0 F$G$
#
H$ 4()
/ &$ C
'(
,, *
# !* 4$G$ 4( .
&$ . 0$ I
! #D!
A 3 &$ 1
=& ) (/$
!# 8!
:
$
;
) )+ &( '(
)/
( $$ #95
& )
$
(
& )
0 3 * C$$ H + ) & $ 0)$$ -*
## !
#D2 -(? 0
$ & $ 0 G(61
$*
# !
!
0 A()
$ & $ 0 4/*
# # #2 &( =&
,, ()C
& $ 0+ ?) 01 $*
!
$G$ 4( .
& $ A$
/*
# # 8 82 ,
$ & $ 0 4/
$*
#
8
A ) 0 & $ 0 4/
$*
#! # $ 8$
= (
'(
'(
1
&&
,
& )* 5
(
& )
4/ 0 (( + .
$ & $ A A()
$
## #
82 = (/ = C
'( & $ (
$ @ 8 8! 2 ())
=
C & $ I6( ?
7) C $* @ # 2
C 7
& $ F @
$
#
8$ D$
@ ,
( )
( $ @ ,
()
. &&
0)$
$ &$ 0 $ C
'(
,,
$*
# ! *
7( (
( 5$ @ A =&
$ & $ 0 4/
$*
D #
#*
( 5
& )
1 $ 3
7( 0(1 )
$ & $ 0 4/ $*
# # !!!*
( 85 )(
) $ 0)/* 7 +
C$ $
$ & $ C
$*
# # *
( 8 5
( $
# $
; & ,
&(
7(
(
& )
(
(
& )
( (
'(
$ 3
( (
)
!
'(
1
( 1( (
,
* /* +
)) ,
(
& )
+ /
(
$ ! $
(
(
& )
1 ($ .(
,
= =& ) (/
)
(/ (
/(
( *
)/ 1 (?
, ,) /(*
+
)) ) $ G
( ,
& )
1 ) ==
)
(/ (
, &(
/
/(
(
/
7( C 7
& $ F @ $
#
8
1 &
(
& ) ,) 5
# *
7(
( > "#$ 3 ( ,
& ):
1 ) & )+ &(
( &
((
,
& )* ,
)
&
&
1 5
(
&
( (
& ) /( )
( $ #!$ 3 ( ,
& ):
) $ 3 ,
, '(
1 (?
,
& ) +
& ) + $ ) * , /(
,)
==
)
(/ (/* )/ (? (
! 5
/(* ,
+ /(
&
)
))(/ , * $ # $
3
& ) (/ (
1
( ,
& ) ( &
&
/(* (
&
&
( (
, / /
& +
& ) (
1 1( &(
&
$ 3 ,
+ (
1 ( ,
& ):
( ,
)(
&
$ #$
,
## ((?
& /(* ( ,
& ):
)/ 1 ,
$ 3
1 ( ((?
/(* ( (/
1
, + /(
))(/ , $ %& , /
*
+/ 1 ))$ 3
1 * 6( '( , )&) & $ 3 )(
& ) + (
1
) &/
))$ 3(
(
( ,
((?
/( (
1 / 1( 5 (
5 ! 5
== $ #8$
3 ( ,
& ):
,
(?
& /(
)/ 1
(
'(/ /($ #D$
3 , ( /(
1
,,$
(
1
/
?
)
?
) ( #
'$ )
'
)*
1 &/ )
&
)
/(
1
,
& )
,
+ /(
&
) 1 ,
1 (
,
& ) 1 )/
(
( 1 ) ,)
( )/ / 1 !
,) , $ #$
@, '(
) &
(1 *
( &
( *
( ,
& ) )/ 1
)(
! 5*
) 1
, ( ( / 1 &1$
I> 3
)
1& &
(16 ,
/$ $ 3,
( , & ) , :
1 ) ,
)
&
/(* &
( &
1 , )
( ,
) ((?
& /( ( /($ @
+
& )
(
(/
)(
(
&
& &
&
($
#$ %& ) /(
,)
==*
(?
,
&
) +
/(
)/ &/ , ( /(
() )) ( 2
& ) /(
,, &
?
))(/ , +
/(
& $ $ 0) /(
,)
(/
& ) (
)/ &
)+
, 9 ) +
(1 $
( (
)+
,
#
+
/(
))(/9 &
) $ 3 ( ,
)
/
( ,
& ):
,
&1
, 1 &/ ,) 5 5$:
C 7 J
'(
== ( 4( ) ! 5
(
)
1 (?
, /
$ (
( &(
&
&
&
( (
* /
/
) $ !#$
@
* &
'(
& )
(
H A(6 * ( &*
)+
(
(?
/( ,
+ /(
&
) $ 0 ,
( ,
& )
&
(
( (
*
/ 8
)+ ,(
( 5* ( &(
(
C 7
(
& )
$ 3
)
+ *
( 1 ) (
1 5$ 5 $ *89 +
( $#* 9
(
)* &(
(
1 $#!*8 9
'$ / $ ;
4 7(
$#!*8!9
'$ / $ 0 0CG
7& I$# 89 ## ,
==
)
7( #$ $ ##
1 ) ,
,( ( &( '(
,) $#!*8!9
'$ /
)
4 7(
)
4 7( $#!8!9
'$ /
) $:
'
'/ 4 &9 :
9 . 0
+! !$
+ %%
C- "11. The evidence produced by the landowners is that the acquired land is close to Educational Institutions, Banks, Tahsil Office etc. whereas there is no evidence that the irrigated agricultural land has the potential of use for either residential or commercial purposes. It is not
# the nature of land which alone is determinative of the market value of the land. The market value must be determined keeping in view the various factors including proximity to the developed area and the road etc. As per the evidence led by the landowners, the land acquired is 1⁄2 km from the road. The land is close to developed residential or commercial or institutional area. On the other hand, there is no evidence that Exh.31 and Exh.32 are in any way comparable to the land acquired. The High Court has erred in law in holding that since the land of the sale exemplars Exh.31 and Exh.32 is of irrigated agricultural land whereas the land acquired is unirrigated, is not the reasonable yardstick to determine market value of the land as the land in question is close to already developed area."
7+%
!
$?
>
+ !
:$?
" !
" + 7+#
+
E>+-% E>+-!
-+ ; " $ > E>+-% E>+-
/ 0
%45
'
++ #+%#+#$%&* > ; !
"
-
> # #$%&
#! " +
!
"
" " + B " 4+ < " +
4+%
!
" "
"
" " - " > E>+-% E>+- + !
%&+$%+#$%7
6 - -
!
3 !
"
+%!5$!$$!$$$8- !
>
!
3 + !
!
>
>
!
3 " " " + %&+$%+#$%7
6 - -
!
3
> # #$%&
> C- "!$ @ &
( 1( )+ &(
( '( $ @ & &
( '(
+
/$ 3 , )+ &( 4/ -&)
(
=& & C
7)) ( 7)
7))
=&
1
&
4/ -&$ H , I$##8 #!9# #
#$##$ #!$ I = 7 * -(()
,
( 0 8
$ 3 = 7 * -(()
'(
, ,
& I$#
#
D$ $ #
( / )+ &(9
( '( $ 3
,
$ = 7 * -(( $#* * * 9
7 I/ C
/ , +
& I$! 9=
$#$ #$ A &* 1&
(
)+ )
$ = 7 * -(()$ @ &
)
(
,
= & C
7))* -(() 6(
,* 0* @
)
/$:
4+# !
# #$%&
!
"
!
> "
+ !
-
E>+-% E>+E>+- " >
+ + 5+ !
"
+ $?
> "
7
!
"
# #$%&
+ ($ ( / '
(9 ;
# 3 "7
,
:
) )+ &( )/>K
)+ &(* , /*
,
@ 0) * #D
#D ,
)
*
)/ 1* *
(
1
&
,
) /
(
& & / 2
)(
)
( (
(1
'(
, &
)
, (1
& 6 &
# > G&
,
) )+ &(
1
,
1
(
(
##$ % #$K3 &
,
(
1
1
)
+
(
)
,
) / & & /
( )) / /
/
( '(
1 ) $ % $K
) &
,
% #* , ()1
)
1 )
1 +
($
% $K;
) )+ &( (
&
,
% # % * /
) ,
'(
( &
1 +
$
% !$K;
) )+ &( (
&
,
% # % * / 7
& ( & )+ &( )/ 1
(
, (
( )+ &($
3 )+ &(
(
(1
#
1 )(
, 1
,
($
; )+ &( (
(1
#
(1
1
)
, K
(
(
( / , ) 1 , 2
1
)
)
(
(1
# ,
)
&1 , )) / /
)+ &(
1
,
( @ 0) * #D
#D (/* 0 -&)
,/ , ))() (
1
#8
(
)
,
(1
#
) /
(
)) 6 >
G&
'( . / ,,
& 1 '(
) * , '(
(
/,&
* &(
(
(
(1
#
(1
(1
)/ 1>
G&
,( '( . /
) /
1 '( +
&(
( 1 &(
(
(
(1
#>
G&
7
* 1, /
'(
/ * +
/
&
( )+ &(
1
& )+ >
G&
-&)
( )+ &(
)
, '( /
/ ( ( 1
)
(
(
)/
1
(
(
1 1
) ( (
$:
!
"
+ #'%*'"* #!
"
"
+ ; !
#'%*!
!
"
+
#D %$+ !
;A"
<
' ! #& %45
# #$%&
!
"
>
"
+ %
> C- "!#$ @ & 1&
)
1
(
) '( * #$ 3( ( )(
1
/ /
( $ @
1 , 7 L
)+ 6( )
)+ &(
)
( 0 #* ,
)
/ 7 $ @ ,
*
( ,) 7) (/ 7))
$:
%%+ <
!
"
-2
>
"
"
7
+ B "
"
> B+ 7
F !
+
"+
!
- =
# & ' <
F & <
F & /) '
01 <
F 64 & <
'/ <
' *!
"
=
%45
#$%&
+
%#+ ,
!
!
+
"
+7
+
"
#7
!
" " > !
" %&#
+ / !
;A"
>
%45
!
"
> !
"
!
" + ; !
!
"
#$%&
#
" " !
+
!
> !
!
"
> !
"
+ %#+% !
/
!
8>
" !
!
+
$?
> "
7
!
!
" %$?
"
G
" + %&+
!
" !
- "
+&!$!$!#&58-
>
7
%$?
"
#$%&
+ %+
<
!
!
!
-
;<<2 "
+ %:+
!
- !
' *-
' * " " !
" >
"
- F "=
# + %+
H !
!
+ #4+%$+#$#:
@
8 C I 8B @ "C I 8 B + B+ B+ %+ -&5-#$#:
'61/* # -#-#$#:
'61/* &+ -:$-#$#:
'61/* + -:%-#$#:
'61/* :
-:#-#$#:
'61/* + -:&-#$#:
'61/* -4-#$#:
'61/* -7$-#$#:
'61/* -7:-#$#:
'61/* %$ -4-#$#:
'61/* %% -7&-#$#:
'61/* %# -77#-#$#:
'61/* %& -47-#$#:
'61/* % -44-#$#:
'61/* %:
-45-#$#:
'61/* % -5$-#$#:
'61/* %7 -5%-#$#:
'61/* %4 -5#-#$#:
'61/* %5 -5&-#$#:
'61/* #$ -5-#$#:
'61/* #% -5:-#$#:
'61/* ## -5-#$#:
'61/* #& -57-#$#:
'61/* # -54-#$#:
'61/* #:
-55-#$#:
'61/* # -7$$-#$#:
'61/* #7 -7$%-#$#:
'61/*
#4+%$+#$#: