Rajneesh Jain v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4818 of 2015 Date of Decision: March 18, 2015 Rajneesh Jain .....Petitioner versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

Present:Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner, on the basis of his own interpretation of Clause-7 of "General Instructions to Applicants" appended with the Car Bazar Policy, apprehends that he might not be treated eligible to participate in the public auction.

As of now, we see no reason or basis for such an apprehension. In case the petitioner's application is rejected, we grant him liberty to approach the appropriate forum. With liberty afore-mentioned, the writ petition stands disposed of.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE March 18, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.20 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh