Dinesh Yadav v. Huda & ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 3983- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 29. 02. 2016 Smt . Di nesh Yadav . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus Har yana Ur ban Devel opment Aut hor i t y, Panchkul a and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Neer aj Yadav, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pl ot has been r e- al l ot t ed i n f avour of t he pet i t i oner . I n r espect of t he or i gi nal pl ot l i t i gat i on i s pendi ng. The pet i t i oner , t her ef or e, made an appl i cat i on f or an al t er nat e pl ot . The al t er nat e pl ot havi ng not been al l ot t ed t o t he pet i t i oner , she addr essed a r epr esent at i on ( Annexur e P- 9) t o t he r espondent s on 14. 09. 2014. The pet i t i oner has al l eged t hat she was i nf or med t hat t he Est at e Of f i cer had sent t he pet i t i oner ' s case t o t he Admi ni st r at or , HUDA f or appr oval and t hat she was f ur t her i nf or med t hat t he Est at e Of f i cer woul d al l ot t he pl ot af t er obt ai ni ng t he sai d appr oval . 2.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s di sposed of by di r ect i ng t he r espondent s t o t ake a deci si on on t he r epr esent at i on and i f t he pet i t i oner i s ent i t l ed t o an al t er nat e pl ot t o do t he needf ul i n r espect t her eof by 30. 06. 2016.

( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

29. 02. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.03.01 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh