Singara Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4000 of 2016 Date of Decision: February 29, 2016 Singara Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.Baljinder Singh Ichhewal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that shamlat land measuring about 50 acres which vests in Gram Panchayat of his village, was earlier under illegal possession of the encroachers who were lawfully dispossessed in execution of eviction orders but they have again encroached upon the said land. Reference is made to the complaints made by the District Magistrate Patiala to Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala (P-3 & P-4) wherein the details of encroachers and the area re-occupied by them is mentioned. The petitioner thus seeks action against the encroachers.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought, however without expressing any views on merits of the allegations contained in the writ petition or the documents appended thereto, we MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.03.03 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.4000 of 2016 [2] dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Patiala and Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, to ascertain the correct facts mentioned communications and take appropriate lawful recourse, as may be required, within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE February 29, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.03.03 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh