Suman v. State Of U.T Chandigarh And Others

CRWP-6316-2025 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.121 CRWP-6316-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.06.2025 SUMAN ..... Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH

Present:

Ms. Divya Gulati, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and her family members from the hands of respondent No.4. 2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) before respondent No.2 raising her grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. At this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2, to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner in a time bound manner. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Addl. PP, UT, Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that he has no objection in case the prayer made by the learned counsel for the KAVITA NAIN 2025.06.13 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment

CRWP-6316-2025 (O&M) 2 petitioner at this stage is allowed. Let a complete set of the paper-book be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5.

In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6.

Needless to say, if any threat perception is found to the petitioner(s), the official respondents would provide her adequate security in order to protect her life and liberty.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 13.06.2025 Kavita Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2025.06.13 13:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment