Monu @ Mannu @ Abhimanyu v. Surender And ORS.

FAO-3546-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3546-2012 (O&M) Date of decision:- 22.05.2026 Monu @ Mannu @ Abhimanyu ...Appellant vs.

Surender and ors.

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- None **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1.

On 13.05.2026, this Court passed the following order:- "As per office report, notice issued to respondent No.1 has been received back served and no application has been filed by learned counsel for the appellant for impleading the legal representative(s) of respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to implead legal representative(s) of respondent No.2.

There is no representation on behalf of the parties. In the interest of justice, adjourned to 22.05.2026. To be shown in the Urgent List.

Registry is directed to issue notice to the appellant, respondent No.2 well as their counsel about the date fixed before this Court.

In the meantime, record of the Tribunal, if not received, be requisitioned for the date fixed and scanned copy of the same be uploaded on DMS."

2.

As per office report, appellant has been duly served and GAURAV ARORA 2026.05.27 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

FAO-3546-2012 Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate appearing on his behalf has also been informed. Today the matter was called twice but there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the present case. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly, the present appellant is dismissed for want of prosecution.

4.

Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. 22.05.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2026.05.27 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document