Harshita v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 696 of 2019 Date of Decision: 30.08.2019 Harshita

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA By Post:

Present:

Mr. Avtar Singh Sandhu, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that husband of petitioner, namely, Sunny Kumar, was called by the police in connection with investigation of case bearing FIR No. 63 dated 30.07.2016, registered at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and was thereafter let off. The petitioner has got recorded her statement (Annexure R-1/T) to the police that her husband is living with her and she does not want to pursue her application made to Hon'ble Chief Justice of this Court. In view of submission of learned State counsel and reply filed by him, which is supported by statement of petitioner-Harshita, instant petition is disposed of as no further action is required to be taken in this petition.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 30, 2019 JUDGE jk Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JITENDER KUMAR 2019.09.02 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh