Chetna Mittal And ANR. v. Deputy Commissioner And ORS.

-1CWP No.4218 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.4218 of 2016 Date of decision: 26.09.2016 Chetna Mittal and another ....Petitioners

Versus

Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. G.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, for Bank of Baroda. ***** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notices dated 07.11.2015 (Annexure P-1), 04.02.2016 (Annexure P-10) and reply dated 17.02.2016 (Annexure P-9) whereby notices under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the Act') have been issued by the respondent bank to the petitioners.

2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act.

Ravinder Singh 2016.10.17 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.4218 of 2016 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

However, it shall be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 26.09.2016 (RAMENDRA JAIN) R.S.

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2016.10.17 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document