← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/18280/2026disposed of

Rashpal Kaur And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

2026-05-29Mr. Justice Namit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18280-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 Rashpal Kaur and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present :

Ms. Neesh Garg, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioners.

**** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari, for quashing the order dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure P-1), passed by respondent No.2. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought for directing the respondents to grant an opportunity to the petitioners to participate in the selection process of selecting the vacant stations falling in their respective districts and allot them new stations on the same terms and conditions from the date of initial joining with all consequential reliefs before finalizing the promotion process. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have also made a representation dated 18.5.2026 (Annexure P-7) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. She further submits that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said representation, VINAY 2026.05.29 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-18280-2026 -2by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On receipt of advance copy, Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case.

6.

Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 18.5.2026 (Annexure P-7) submitted by the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to them, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioners. 29.05.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No VINAY 2026.05.29 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment