Harpal Kaur Dhanesar v. Union Of India And Others
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 16374 of 2023 Date of Decision: 16.08.2023 Harpal Kaur Dhanesar ---Petitioner versus Union of India and others ---Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:
Mr. Sunny Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Central Government Counsel for Union of India Mr. Deepanjay Sharma D.A.G, Punjab **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.
!"#$ %&
% '
(
)*$ + + $ & ,$- , ' ,' &
& . - %&
#
#/ !
, 0 & 1 - '& %&
3 3 ' 4 ,
5 ,2
/ PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.08.16 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP No. 16374 of 2023 -2-
%' '
&%
- !
%
-
6
$ - ,
,'
1 %
-
6
"
3 3 ' 4 ,
5 % $6 '
Mohan Lal @ Mohna vs. Union of India and others, CWP No. 27167 of 2018 submits that if impugned order is set aside, the competent authority would look into the matter and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
5.
In the wake of statements of both sides and considering the fact that impugned order was passed without granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, police has already filed cancellation report and complainant has passed away, the petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside with a direction to the petitioner to appear before Passport Authority on 06.09.2023 with the requisite documents. On doing so, the Passport Authority would look into grievance of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in view of the afore-stated judgment of this Court.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 16.08.2023 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2023.08.16 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment