Jarnail Kaur v. Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab And Others
CWP-16329-2023 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16329-2023 Date of Decision: December 11, 2023 Jarnail Kaur ......Petitioner
Versus
Financial Commissioner(Appeals), Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:
Mr.Amar Jeet, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms.Akshita Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.Gursimranjit Singh, Advocate for respondents N o.5 and 8.
Mr.Amardeep Singh Rai, Advocate for respondents No.9 to 12.
........
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Petitioner has approached this Court praying for quashing of impugned Naksha Bey, dated 17.07.2015, Annexure P-6, impugned order dated 05.08.2015, passed by A.C. (Ist Grade)-cum-Naib Tehsildar, Joga, Annexure P-8, impugned order dated 11.01.2016, Annexure P-9, passed by SDM-cum-Collector, Mansa in appeal bearing No.15 dated 31.08.2015, order dated 02.05.2018, (Annexure P-10) passed by Commissioner, Faridkot Divison, Faridkot, and order dated 30.05.2023, passed by learned Financial Commissioner, (Appeals), Punjab, Chandigarh, Annexure P-12, being illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and hence liable to the set aside. It has been submitted by counsel for both the parties that this MEENU 2023.12.13 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CWP-16329-2023 -2Court had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and the outstanding issues between both the parties have been amicably resolved and hence the present petition be disposed of. Report of the Mediator has also been placed on record. Both the counsels are also ad idem that the impugned order be set aside.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of in view of the terms and conditions of Settlement/Agreement arrived at between the parties, dated 10.10.2023 and hence impugned orders, dated 17.07.2015, 05.08.2015, 11.01.2016, 02.05.2018 and 30.05.2023 (Annexures P-6, P-8, P9, P-10 and P-12) are set aside. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement effected between them which is already on the file. However, parties would be at liberty to pursue their remedies in case any further cause of action accrues.
December 11, 2023 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No MEENU 2023.12.13 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment