Ram Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5261 of 2015 Decided on : 29.06.2015 Ram Kumar . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Mr. R.K. Handa, Advocate for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is seeking quashing of order dated 16.08.2012, whereby, respondent No.3 has declined the request of the petitioner for treating the litigation period as zero period in respect of plot No.185, Sector 8, Urban Estate, Karnal and refund of extension fee. 2.

After arguing for sometime, when the Bench was not agreeing with the learned counsel for the petitioner, it was prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition in order to seek appropriate remedy before the authorities for the relief as claimed in the instant writ petition.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) June 29, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.06.30 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh