Samita Garg v. Vishal Singla
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.120 TA-864-2024 Date of Decision: 20.03.2025
....Applicant
Versus
.....Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Kashish Garg, Advocate for the applicant.
Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 19.12.2024.
***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
!"
#$
# " %&$' ('&' )* "
+ , & ' &
- .
/ "
& " 0 " ,
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 03.07.2017, but no child was born from the said wedlock. It was the second marriage of both the applicant, as well as the respondent. However, on account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is not Sonu 2025.03.20 15:13 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC
having any source of earning and is solely dependent upon her parental family. No other litigation is stated to be pending between the parties. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 120 kilometres, to defend the divorce petition, from the place of her residence.
In view of the submissions aforesaid and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, considering the fact about the respondent not having coming forward to resist the application, the transfer application is allowed and !"
#$
# "
& %&$' ('&' )* "+
, " ' &
- . 1 #
#$ %&$' ('&' ) * " + *".
, + *". " %&$' ". 20 " # %&$' ". " &
& $
(ARCHANA PURI) 20.03.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes Whether reportable :
Yes/No Sonu 2025.03.20 15:13 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC