Indu Sharma v. State Of Punjab And ORS

C. W. P. No. 5291 of 2015 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 114 Case No. : C. W. P. No. 5291 of 2015 Date of Decision : March 23, 2015 Indu Sharma ....

Petitioner Vs.

State of Punjab and others ....

Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * To be referred to Reporters or not ?

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? * * * Present :

Mr. Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate for the petitioner.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the legal notice dated 16.08.2014 (Annexure P-12), issued by the learned counsel for the petitioner. I find the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner to be reasonable. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of MONIKA 2015.03.24 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

C. W. P. No. 5291 of 2015 2 the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to take decision on the legal notice dated 16.08.2014 (Annexure P-12), issued by the learned counsel for the petitioner, by passing a speaking order, preferably within four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, she would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. ( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE March 23, 2015 monika MONIKA 2015.03.24 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document