Vijay Kumar Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

YOGESH SHARMA 2019.10.03 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-23975-2018 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23975-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.09.2019 Vijay Kumar Sharma ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though, grievance of petitioner, in present writ petition, has been redressed, however, with regard to promotion from the date when juniors were promoted, he would be making representation and in case, a direction is issued to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law. Keeping in view the aforementioned facts, present writ petition is ordered to be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case, any representation is made, the same shall be decided within a period of two months from the date of its receipt and a speaking order be passed thereon after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 30.09.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No