Norang Lal v. Paramjit Singh
1
!" #$%$!&' ( ( !) &*+ , (( $ $!& ) - )%.% ) /0$ 1$&*2 ((( %3!&4 & ' 5+(111
11 6(
!"#$$ % & '('"#'##)* +,-
$112"''+'"#'## 23 &4 5-
-
- +''(#'##)* 6, - . 6 $/0 2$ +(7#'68966':#'68 &4 23 #
- & 6+"
2 -; & 5 - & $ 5
% 2+7"#:+ #''(#'68& 1++#'''9& - 2+##7"#6+88#5 ; /0
2 -
% & - & &
& 5 && 9
+
-
& 5 *& $<6 56"'##'#6 = & +6+$$ 5 - +''(#'## +66 $$5& - & *& & & 5 - $ +''(#'##- 5& 5 & & 5 5 5 5 5 5% - 5 5 +66 $$ ! -
5-
9 - $ & 5 - $ - $ & 5 -
9 5 & 5 - & *& &- & -*5
5 - +66$$ -5
4
3 ; '('"#'##)* +,5 - $ (
)* #, = -& 5
& 5 5 5 9
; 5 5
5 0 5 & % 5 *& & - 5 +66$$ -&= & &4 1 < 5 - - $ . /0 #!66#'665 & 5 & ; 5 & - & 9 > ?
@ /0 = & - *& & & 4 4 : ;
7 5 - *& +66$$
4 !
"
#
$ " +66$$5 $ * 5 +66$$ 5 8 ; 5 +66$$ $
!"!!# $ % &'"(!"!!# Be that as it may, in the present application the recall, recross examination of the complainant is sought by the petitioner-accused on account of change of counsel. Firstly, the change of counsel is no ground for recall of witness. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in AG Vs. Shiv Kumar Yadav & Anr. 2015(9) Scake 649: 2015 Cri.L.R. (SC) 1007 has held so." 6' &
-- * 5 & 9% % - & 5 - +66$$; )* #,5 5 & & 5 - & & - & & 5 & & 6+" 2 -; & 5 - 5 & ; - -
5 - & 5 66 ; 5 -; &
& -
11 ( ( 1 72 2 )%3 8$&*9) %!& 4' %9!
72 2 )) 3!) :, ' %9!