← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32573/2026disposed of

Naresh v. State Of Haryana And Others

2026-06-02Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32573-2026 Date of decision : 02.06.2026 NARESH ...... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present :

Mr. Ranjodh Singh Jodha, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana.

***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 to take appropriate legal action on the complaint/representation dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) against respondents No.5 and 6.

2.

The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) before the respondent No.3-the SHO, Police Station Kharkhoda, Sonipat. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.3 to decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. 3.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4 only. VIPIN KUMAR 2026.06.02 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-32573-2026 4.

Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Sunny Namdev, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4-State. Hence, the service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) be given to the respondent No.3 and that the instant petition be disposed of accordingly. 6.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.-3 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2), by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level.

(SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 02.06.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether Reportable :

No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.06.02 13:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document