Ashiya Rani And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-6439-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 ASHIYA RANI AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY.

****

Present:

Mr. Monika Jangra Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana.

**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members.

2.

Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if the Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 26.05.2026 (Annexure P-5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3.

As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 01.01.2002 and 10.08.2002, respectively. The copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively. They got married on 26.05.2026 and the Marriage Certificate and photographs are enclosed with the petition as Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively. RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.29 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

CRWP-6439-2026 -24.

Notice of motion.

5.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 26.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.

7.

It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 29, 2026.

JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.29 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order