Sudesh Kumari v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4007-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 Sudesh Kumari ......Appellant Vs.

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

None for the appellant.

Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents.

**** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1.

On the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2.

As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that she has retired from service and learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through e-mail. 3.

Today, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. 4.

In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5.

Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

6.

Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellant to move an application to revive this appeal, if any cause of action survives. 7.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 24.03.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.03.25 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document