← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/24277/2018dismissed

Jeeva Nand Joshi v. State Of Haryana And Others

2019-03-11Mr. Justice A.B. Chaudhari2 pages

CWP No. 24277-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 24277-2018 Date of decision : 11.03.2019 Jeeva Nand Joshi

...Petitioner

versus State of Haryana and ors.

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. I.S. Pabla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.A.G Haryana **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Petitioner is seeking direction to respondents to call the petitioner for interview for the post of TGT Science On 25.09.2018, this Court passed the following order:- "Learned counsel submits that pursuant to advertisement dated 28.06.2015, the petitioner applied for the post of TGT Science (Rest of Haryana) in General category and appeared in the written examination. As per answer key uploaded by the Commission on the website, the petitioner is securing 110 marks and the last candidate who has been called for interview in General category secured 110 marks. Notice of motion for 11.03.2019.

In the meantime, the petitioner shall be interviewed provisionally, subject to the decision of the writ petition and his result be kept in a sealed cover.

Gaurav Arora 2019.03.20 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 24277-2018 A copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Secretary/Reader attached with this Court." Short reply filed by learned State counsel in the Court today, is taken on record.

Learned State counsel has produced the result of the petitioner in a sealed cover, which has been opened by the Reader of this Court. As per result, the petitioner has secured 108 marks in written examination and 12 marks in viva voice (total 120 marks) and and the last candidate has secured 135 marks.

In view of the above factual position, the writ petition stands dismissed, as the petitioner has secured less marks than the last candidate. The result has been returned back in original to learned State counsel in the Court today.

11.03.2019 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2019.03.20 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh