Ajay Alias Ajay Saroha And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36528-2024 Date of decision: September 30th, 2024 Ajay @ Ajay Saroha and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Ms. Pallavi Babbar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners in the instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are seeking quashing of FIR No.84 dated 11.03.2024 under Sections 323, 34, 506 of the IPC registered at Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.07.2024 (Annexure P-3). 2.

Vide order dated 31.07.2024 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 30.08.2024 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

3.

Report has since been received from learned trial Court, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.09.30 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-36528-2024 -2factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that she would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed.

4.

The trial Court has annexed the copies of the statements of the parties, along with its report.

5.

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

6.

In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed.

7.

Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. September 30th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.09.30 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh