Gram Panchayat Hamirgarh Dhaipee v. State Of Punjab Etc
CWP-4932-2016 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4932-2016 Date of Decision: October 26, 2017 Gram Panchayat Hamirgarh Dhaipee .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.
To be referred to the Reporters or not?
Yes/No 2.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.
3.
Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......
Present:
Mr.Dinesh Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Anu Pal,AAG, Punjab.
Mr.S.K.Jain, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6. ........
SURYA KANT, J.
On August 17, 2017, this Court had directed the Consolidation Officer, Sangrur, to decide the Claim Petition which had been filed by the private respondents within a period of two months. [2] We are informed that in compliance thereto the Consolidation Officer has decided the Claim Petition.
[3] It was further noticed that the eviction petition filed by the Gram Panchayat against the private respondents had been adjourned sine die by the Collector due to pendency of the Claim Petition before the Consolidation Officer. Since the said Claim Petition has been now decided, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2Meenu 2017.11.01 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
CWP-4932-2016 -2DDPO, Mansa, to decide the eviction petition filed by the Gram Panchayat against the private respondents in accordance with law and in conformity with the principles of natural justice.
[4] Let the said petition be decided expeditiously but preferably within a period six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE October 26, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No Meenu 2017.11.01 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh