Saudagar Singh v. Raj Pal Singh And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH FAO-4343-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 01.08.2017 Saudagar Singh .....Appellant

Versus

Raj Pal Singh and another .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6. Ms. Navdeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6 (legal aid counsel).

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 have placed on record the copy of compromise deed effected between the parties and the same is taken on record as Annexure A-1. Further, he states that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous and the same be dismissed as such.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants is not disputing the above-said compromise deed Dismissed, as having rendered infructuous.

( RITU BAHRI ) August 01, 2017 JUDGE naresh.k Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.09.27 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh