← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/9806/2021dismissed

Kirandeep Kaur v. State Of Punjab And Others

2021-10-13Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.116 CRWP No.9806 of 2021 Date of Decision: 13.10.2021 Kirandeep Kaur

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that so far as the prayer as made by the petitioner qua the protection of her life and liberty is concerned, she would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.4-Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, exclusively praying therein for the said protection only and as regards the remaining part of her request, as set-forth in her representation, i.e. Annexure P-1, she would be availing the appropriate and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to her under law, for this purpose and he further prays that respondent No.4 be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the fresh representation of the petitioner within some specific time frame.

Ms. Samina Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, NEETU RANI 2021.10.13 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRWP No. 9806 of 2021 -2- .....

Punjab, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 in this case, in pursuance of the copies of the instant petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection to the above-discussed submission as well as the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn with a direction to respondent No.4 that in case, the petitioner moves any fresh representation to him restricting her prayer therein to the protection of her life and liberty only, he will look into the same and if the petitioner would be found to be genuinely deserving the said protection, then this respondent shall take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of the facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably within a period of ten days. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 13.10.2021 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2021.10.13 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC