High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/26183/2017dismissed

Suman Dahiya v. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commisssion Haryana Kand ANR.

2018-08-03Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26183 of 2017 Date of Order: 03.08.2018 Suman Dahiya ....Petitioner

Versus

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Naveen S Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents. RITU BAHRI, J (ORAL) At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the respondents has informed that in pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the petitioner was interviewed for the post of President and has been found to be not suitable.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

August 03, 2018 (RITU BAHRI ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2018.08.07 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document