Akshay Jain v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-37379-2023 2023:PHHC:123513

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37379-2023 Decided on: 20.09.2023 Akshay Jain

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 10.07.2023 Anti Corruption Bureau, District Faridabad 7, 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120B IPC (Sections 13(1)(b) read with Section 13(2) of PC act and Section 34 IPC added later on) 1.

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above, had come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. 2.

Vide order dated 06.09.2023, the petitioner was granted interim bail and the said order is continuing till date.

3.

Petitioner's counsel submits that they have voluntarily complied with the previous orders dated 06.09.2023 as well as 13.09.2023. 4.

On instructions from Inspector Sohan Lal, Counsel for the State is not disputing the contention made by counsel for the petitioner. 5.

Given above, interim order dated 06.09.2023 is made absolute. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 20.09.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ANJU RANI 2023.09.20 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document