High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37439/2023allowed

Karan Pal v. State Of Haryana And Another

2023-10-09Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2023:PHHC:130349 CRM-M-37439-2023 Date of decision: October 9th, 2023 Karan Pal .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.40 dated 31.01.2017 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC registered at Police Station Faridabad Kotwali, District Faridabad, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 28.07.2023 (Annexure P-2). Vide order dated 02.08.2023 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 04.09.2023 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.10.09 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-M-37439-2023 -2compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report.

Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed.

Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. October 9th, 2023 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.10.09 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh