← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/36244/2024disposed of

Ved Pal Tanwar v. State Of Haryana And Another

2025-09-16Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 16.09.2025 1.

CRM-M-36244-2024 VED PAL TANWAR .... PETITIONER VS.

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

....RESPONDENTS 2.

CRM-M-44527-2023 (O&M) NAVEEN GOEL .... PETITIONER VS.

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

....RESPONDENTS 3.

CRM-M-48548-2023 RAMAN SOKHAL .... PETITIONER VS.

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai, Advocate (through VC) and Mr. Yogesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-36244-2024).

Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocate Ms. Rubina Vermani, Advocate and Ms. Radhika Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-44527-2023).

Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Ms. Niharika Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-48548-2023).

Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Special Counsel (through VC), Mr. Lokesh Narang, Senior Panel Counsel and Mr. Shubham Dhariwal, Advocate for the respondent No.2.

**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of the FIR No.449 dated 14.08.2023 under Sections 420, 463, 471 and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani and all other consequential proceedings emanating thereof qua the petitioner(s). KUSUM 2025.09.17 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

CRM-M-36244-2024 and other connected matters In view of the fact that the FIR No.449 dated 14.08.2023, registered under Sections 420, 463, 471 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani, has culminated in a closure report, the present petitions seeking quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are rendered infructuous and are disposed of as such.

Needless to say, in case the petitioners are sought to be arrayed as accused in future, they are at liberty to avail their remedies in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 16.09.2025 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2025.09.17 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh