Sunita Kumari And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others
CWP No. 20965 of 2021 -1109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 20965 of 2021 Date of Decision: 16.11.2021 Sunita Kumari and others -Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others -Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:
Mr. Prateek Ratheee, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5.
**** RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case their grievances are heard by respondent No.2 in the context of representation Annexure P-10 and thereafter, respondent No.2 may pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Learned senior counsel for respondents No.2 to 5 submits that the pending representation of the petitioners shall be decided after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners in case they appear before respondent No.2 within 03 days.
JYOTI SHARMA 2021.11.16 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 20965 of 2021 -2Petitioners may also supplement their grievances by way of additional document, if any.
In the event of their appearance before respondent No.2, the representation shall be decided strictly in accordance with law.
With this arrangement, this petition is disposed of. 16.11.2021 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2021.11.16 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document