← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/40416/2022disposed of

Sumit @ Anshu @ Chummi v. State Of Punjab

2022-12-08Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40416-2022 Date of decision : 08.12.2022 SUMIT @ ANSHU @ CHUMMI ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Mr. Fatehjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jaiteshwar Singh, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Short reply by way of affidavit of Raj Kumar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division STF Jalandhar, has been filed on behalf of respondent-State today in Court. The same is taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 5th of September, 2022, the petitioner appeared before the Trial Court and stands admitted to interim bail. He submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the Trial court regularly without default. Petitioner is facing trial in case FIR No.170 dated 25th of September, 2021 registered for offence punishable under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Special Task Force Punjab, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) and was admitted to regular bail vide order dated 2nd of November, 2021. However, owing to absence on 5th of August, 2022 his bail bonds were ordered to be cancelled and forfeited. DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.12.09 08:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-40416-2022 -2Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already surrendered before the Trial Court and undertakes to appear before Trial Court regularly, interim bail granted vide order dated 5th of September, 2022 is ordered to be made absolute.

Disposed off accordingly.

December 08, 2022 (PANKAJ JAIN) Dpr JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.12.09 08:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document