Subhash Chand And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

1 CWP No. 24758 of 2018 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No. 24758 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2024 Subhash Chand and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE Present :

Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate, for petitioner No.2. Mr. Naveen S.Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate, for respondent=Pt.B.D.Sharma University.

Mr. P.R.Yadav, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent= Medical Council of India.

****
    


 This petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for the following substantial reliefs:-
    

 

    



   

      



    

    

       

    



       

 

 

 !"#!"#$! % &  '($

   

)       



 

)  



 

  

*  

  % &  '(+    ,   

   

  

  , *  

  

 #-"#+"#$- % &  '(+  

    , 

 ,    

 *   * 



 )   









     

    

 

      



 

    

       

   



  

2 CWP No. 24758 of 2018 (O&M)  

    

*      

 *     

      * .    

       )



)   

  $/  $     



"

 

  



 

  , * 

    , 

 ,    

 *   * 

   

 

#-"#+"#$-% & '(+"  0   

   



*      



     



         

   *            ) 



" * 



)  

       

      

 

 

 !"#!"#$!

    ) *

 

)      

   

    

    



      

  #$(#$    

 *     , "1 2.

The grievance of the petitioners, who are the parents of the students, is against the notification (Annexure P-12) issued by the State of Haryana on 28.08.2018 creating a sub classification within the class of Economically Backward category.

3.

It is not disputed at the Bar by learned counsel for the rival parties that vide order dated 24.08.2021 the Apex Court in Pichra Warg Kalyan Mahasabha Haryana (Regd.) and another vs. State of Haryana and another 2021(3) SCT 747, has quashed the foundational notification dated 17.08.2016 issued by the State of Haryana and as such the consequential notification dated 28.08.2018 (Annexure P-12) issued by the State of Haryana also pales into insignificance. The Apex Court, however, while quashing the aforesaid notification, saved the admissions of the students made in the meanwhile. 4.

In the instant petition, the wards of the petitioners have completed their MBBS course and in all probability are undergoing internship or may have completed the same.

3 CWP No. 24758 of 2018 (O&M) 5.

The aforesaid position is not disputed by learned counsel for the State of Haryana.

6.

In view of the above and following the verdict of the Apex Court laid down in Pichra Warg Kalyan Mahasabha Haryana (Regd.) (supra), the impugned notices (Annexure P-9) issued pursuant to the aforesaid notification dated 28.08.2018 (Annexure P-12) are liable to be set aside. Equity demands that in the changed circumstances, the admissions of the wards of the petitioners, who have completed their MBBS course and have either received or will receive the degree ought to be saved. 7.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Pichra Warg Kalyan Mahasabha Haryana (Regd.) (supra) and the impugned notices (Annexure P-9) issued by the respondents pursuant to the aforesaid notification dated 28.08.2018 (Annexure P-12) are set aside and admission of their wards in the MBBS course is saved. However, this order shall not be cited as a precedent. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE 29.07.2024 ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable √Yes/No