Surjit Singh And Others v. Commissioner, Ambala Division And Others

CWP-26505-2017 -1HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26505-2017 Date of Decision: December 18, 2017 Surjit Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Mayank Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Kuldeep Tewari, Addl.AG, Haryana for respondent nos.1 to 4.

Mr.Amarjit Markan, Advocate for private respondents. ........

SURYA KANT, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that certified copy of the order dated 31.10.2017 passed by Appellate Authority-cumCommissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, has been received on 23.11.2017 and they have filed a revision petition against the same which has not been listed so far.

[2] In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to learned Revisional Authority to make an endeavour to decide the revision petition by way of a reasoned order and after hearing the parties concerned, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt Meenu 2017.12.21 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh of a copy of this order. Till such time status quo re: possession be

CWP-26505-2017 -2maintained subject to compliance of the orders dated August 09, 2017 and 14.09.2017 passed by this Court whereby the petitioners' are required to deposit the security amount towards mesne profits. ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE December 18, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.12.21 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh